Start practising

Opinion (Agree / Disagree) Technology Task 2

Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A full IELTS Writing Task 2 answer to this question, with a paragraph plan, ideas you can use, and the vocabulary that fits this topic.

The question

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

How to read this question

You are given one statement and asked how far you agree. The examiner is checking that you take a clear position in the introduction and hold it consistently to the conclusion — a partial agreement is fine, an unclear one is not.

Paragraph plan

Introduction — Paraphrase the topic and state a clear position. Full disagreement is taken here, but a conditional/balanced thesis is also valid.

Body 1 — Develop the main reason for disagreeing — shared interests as a foundation for meaningful connection.

Body 2 — Develop a second, distinct reason — personality-based connection rather than superficial judgements.

Conclusion — Restate the position clearly, referencing both arguments briefly.

Model essay

Band 8.5–9.0 model essay

316 words

It is often claimed that friendships formed through digital platforms are inherently less meaningful than those cultivated through direct, face-to-face contact. I partly agree with this view for casual online acquaintances, although I contend that sustained online friendships built around shared interests can be just as profound as conventional ones.

To begin, most online friendships lack the depth associated with physical proximity, largely because they are rarely tested by shared adversity. To clarify, face-to-face friends often navigate everyday inconveniences together, such as helping one another during illness, lending money in an emergency, or accompanying each other through difficult errands, which cultivates mutual reliability over time. By contrast, online acquaintances typically interact only through curated messages and carefully selected shared content, seldom witnessing each other's unfiltered daily struggles or offering practical, hands-on help such as running an errand or sitting beside someone during a genuine crisis. Consequently, such friendships frequently remain superficial, sustained more by convenience than genuine emotional investment, and often dissolve once shared interests fade or one party stops replying.

However, this generalisation does not extend to online friendships that persist over many years and involve consistent emotional support. For instance, individuals who share a rare hobby, career path or medical condition sometimes forge closer bonds with distant online contacts than with local acquaintances, since shared understanding can matter more than mere physical presence. When two people consistently check in on each other's wellbeing, offer advice during hardship and maintain contact across years despite never meeting in person, the resulting bond exhibits the same reliability and trust that defines a meaningful offline friendship, regardless of how the relationship first began.

To conclude, while most casual online friendships remain comparatively shallow due to the absence of shared everyday difficulty, I disagree that this observation applies universally, since sustained and emotionally supportive online relationships can be every bit as meaningful as those originally formed face to face.

Created by a Band 8.5–9.0 IELTS Writing achiever — Premium. Sign up free to read the rest of this essay and unlock every model on the site.

Get free access →

Ideas & vocabulary for this topic

Ideas you can use

  • Introduction: Partly agree that casual online friendships are less meaningful, while disagreeing for sustained, interest-based online friendships.
  • Body 1: Argue casual online friendships lack depth because they are not tested by shared everyday adversity, unlike face-to-face friends who help each other through illness or difficult errands.
  • Body 2: Concede that long-term online friendships built around a rare shared hobby or medical condition, with years of consistent emotional check-ins, can be just as reliable as offline ones.
  • Conclusion: Restate that most casual online friendships are shallower, but this does not apply to sustained, emotionally supportive online relationships.
Word or phraseMeaningUsed in a sentence
adversitydifficult or unfavourable circumstancesrarely tested by shared adversity
curatedcarefully selected and presentedcurated messages and carefully selected shared content
unfilterednot adjusted, hidden, or made to look betterunfiltered daily struggles
superficiallacking depth; only on the surfacesuch friendships frequently remain superficial
dissolveto come to an end; to break upoften dissolve once shared interests fade
forgeto create or form, especially through effortforge closer bonds with distant online contacts
wellbeinga person's state of health, happiness and comfortcheck in on each other's wellbeing
reliabilitythe quality of being consistently dependablecultivates mutual reliability over time

Created by a Band 8.5–9.0 IELTS Writing achiever — Premium. Sign up free to see the ideas and vocabulary for this topic and unlock every model on the site.

Get free access →

Write your own answer

Draft your response below and get it marked against all four IELTS criteria — free, no account, one check a day.

0 words Check my answer

Answers checked here may be published on this page, without your name, to help other learners. Nothing else about you is stored.