Start practising

Opinion (Agree / Disagree) Food and diet Task 2

In many countries, coffee chains are expanding rapidly. Some people think that having more chain restaurants around is better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A full IELTS Writing Task 2 answer to this question, with a paragraph plan, ideas you can use, and the vocabulary that fits this topic.

The question

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

In many countries, coffee chains are expanding rapidly. Some people think that having more chain restaurants around is better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

How to read this question

You are given one statement and asked how far you agree. The examiner is checking that you take a clear position in the introduction and hold it consistently to the conclusion — a partial agreement is fine, an unclear one is not.

Paragraph plan

Introduction — Paraphrase the prompt and state a clear position. This model takes a partial agreement — coffee chains offer genuine benefits, but these come with notable trade-offs.

Body 1 — Explain the main reason to agree — the side you support most strongly.

Body 2 — Explain the condition or limitation — where or why the opposite may be true.

Conclusion — Restate the balanced position consistently — do not introduce a new idea.

Model essay

Band 8.5–9.0 model essay

317 words

As coffee chains proliferate rapidly across many countries, some people openly welcome the growing prevalence of chain restaurants. I largely disagree with this view, since the expansion of chains tends to undermine local business diversity, although I acknowledge that chains do offer genuine advantages in terms of consistency and employment.

To begin, the rapid proliferation of coffee chains frequently drives independent, locally owned cafes out of business entirely. This is attributable to the fact that large chains benefit from economies of scale, enabling them to purchase ingredients in bulk, negotiate lower rents and fund extensive advertising campaigns, thereby offering lower prices than small competitors can sustainably match over the long term. For instance, in many city centres, family-run cafes that once served as distinctive community gathering points, each with its own character and regulars, have gradually been replaced by uniform, franchised outlets offering identical menus everywhere. Consequently, neighbourhoods gradually lose the unique character and personalised service that independent establishments traditionally provided, homogenising the local dining landscape.

However, chain restaurants do offer legitimate benefits that should not be dismissed. To illustrate, standardised quality control ensures that customers receive a reliably consistent product regardless of location, which is particularly valuable for travellers unfamiliar with a city's independent options and hesitant to take risks on unknown venues. Moreover, chains typically create considerable local employment, since each new branch opening requires hiring baristas, shift managers and delivery staff. For students and young workers seeking part-time positions, this steady demand for staff can represent a meaningful economic benefit, including structured training and flexible shifts, that smaller, independent cafes may be unable to provide at the same scale.

To conclude, I disagree that a greater prevalence of coffee chains is unambiguously beneficial to communities, given the harm this trend inflicts on independent businesses and local character. Nevertheless, the consistency and employment opportunities chains generate represent a genuine, if partial, counterbalance to this loss.

Created by a Band 8.5–9.0 IELTS Writing achiever — Premium. Sign up free to read the rest of this essay and unlock every model on the site.

Get free access →

Ideas & vocabulary for this topic

Ideas you can use

  • Introduction: Take a mainly-disagree position on chain restaurants being better, while conceding real benefits of consistency and employment.
  • Body 1: Argue chains push out independent cafes through economies of scale in bulk buying and rent, illustrated by family-run cafes being replaced by uniform franchised outlets and losing neighbourhood character.
  • Body 2: Concede chains offer standardised quality that reassures unfamiliar travellers and create considerable local part-time employment for students and young workers.
  • Conclusion: Restate the mainly-disagree position, while accepting consistency and jobs as a genuine, partial counterbalance.
Word or phraseMeaningUsed in a sentence
proliferateto increase rapidly in numbercoffee chains proliferate rapidly across many countries
economies of scalecost advantages gained from producing or buying in large volumeslarge chains benefit from economies of scale
franchisedoperated under licence from a parent brandreplaced by uniform, franchised outlets
homogenisingmaking things become similar or uniformhomogenising the local dining landscape
standardisedmade to conform to a single fixed standardreliably consistent...standardised quality control
baristaspeople who prepare and serve coffee professionallyhiring baristas, shift managers and delivery staff
counterbalancesomething that offsets or balances an opposing effecta genuine, if partial, counterbalance to this loss
unambiguouslyin a way that is completely clear, with only one meaningunambiguously beneficial to communities

Created by a Band 8.5–9.0 IELTS Writing achiever — Premium. Sign up free to see the ideas and vocabulary for this topic and unlock every model on the site.

Get free access →

Write your own answer

Draft your response below and get it marked against all four IELTS criteria — free, no account, one check a day.

0 words Check my answer

Answers checked here may be published on this page, without your name, to help other learners. Nothing else about you is stored.