Start practising

Discussion (Discuss both views) Technology Task 2

Some people think that robots are very important to human future develoment, while others think that they are dangerous and have negative impact on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A full IELTS Writing Task 2 answer to this question, with a paragraph plan and what this question type is asking you to do.

The question

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Some people think that robots are very important to human future develoment, while others think that they are dangerous and have negative impact on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

How to read this question

You are given two opposing views and asked to discuss both before giving your own. The single most common Band 6 cause here is discussing both sides but never stating your own opinion, or stating it only in the conclusion.

Paragraph plan

Introduction — Paraphrase + both views + balanced opinion

Body 1 — Benefits of robots with examples

Body 2 — Dangers and risks with examples

Body 3 — Balanced view with context-dependent reasoning

Conclusion — Summarize both views and restate balanced opinion

Model answer

Model answer

357 words

The role of robotics in society has sparked considerable debate, with proponents arguing that robots are crucial for human progress, while critics warn of their potential dangers to social stability. Although both perspectives have merit, I believe the impact of robots depends largely on how they are implemented and regulated in different sectors of society.

Advocates of robotics emphasize their transformative potential in enhancing human capabilities and safety. Robots excel in hazardous environments where human life would be at risk, such as deep-sea exploration, nuclear facility maintenance, or space missions. In healthcare, surgical robots like the da Vinci system enable minimally invasive procedures with unprecedented precision, reducing recovery time and improving patient outcomes. Furthermore, robots address labor shortages in aging societies by providing eldercare assistance, helping with mobility, medication reminders, and daily tasks that would otherwise require costly human caregivers.

Critics, however, highlight legitimate concerns about robots' societal impact. Mass automation threatens employment across industries, from manufacturing to service sectors, potentially creating widespread economic displacement that could destabilize communities. The automotive industry exemplifies this trend, where robotic assembly lines have eliminated thousands of traditional manufacturing jobs. Additionally, over-reliance on robotic assistance may erode essential human skills and social connections. When robots handle routine tasks, people risk becoming physically inactive and socially isolated, potentially undermining mental health and interpersonal relationships that are fundamental to human well-being.

From my perspective, robots' value depends entirely on their application and the regulatory framework surrounding their deployment. In sectors requiring precision, safety, or addressing genuine human needs - such as medical procedures, disaster response, or elderly care - robots represent invaluable progress. However, indiscriminate automation purely for cost reduction, particularly in areas where employment is crucial for community stability, requires careful consideration. The key lies in implementing robots as tools that augment human capabilities rather than wholesale replacements, ensuring that technological advancement serves broader social interests.

In conclusion, while robots offer remarkable potential for advancing human welfare through enhanced safety and efficiency, they also pose genuine risks regarding employment and social cohesion. The ultimate impact will depend on society's wisdom in harnessing robotic technology thoughtfully, prioritizing human needs over mere economic efficiency.

Model answers written and reviewed by The English All-in-One IELTS team. They are teaching models showing what each band looks like, not real candidate scripts.

This is a discussion (discuss both views) question. The model answer above shows you what a strong answer looks like when it is finished. What it cannot show you is how to get there from a blank page in forty minutes.

That is what our Writing Study Library is for: the structure we teach for this exact question type, the paragraph pattern that goes with it, and the sentence openers for each stage — so the essay is planned before you start writing rather than assembled as you go.

See the structure for this question type →

Write your own answer

Draft your response below and get it marked against all four IELTS criteria — free, no account, one check a day.

0 words Check my answer

Answers checked here may be published on this page, without your name, to help other learners. Nothing else about you is stored.