Start practising

Opinion (Agree / Disagree) Transport Task 2

some people tink that it is more imporant to spend money on roads and motoways than on public transport systems such as railway and trams. to what extent do you agree or disagree

A full IELTS Writing Task 2 answer to this question, with a paragraph plan, ideas you can use, and the vocabulary that fits this topic.

The question

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

some people tink that it is more imporant to spend money on roads and motoways than on public transport systems such as railway and trams. to what extent do you agree or disagree

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

How to read this question

You are given one statement and asked how far you agree. The examiner is checking that you take a clear position in the introduction and hold it consistently to the conclusion — a partial agreement is fine, an unclear one is not.

Paragraph plan

Introduction — Paraphrase the prompt and state a clear conditional position — agree with prioritising public transport but acknowledge the legitimate case for road investment in certain contexts.

Body 1 — Develop the main argument: in urban areas, public transport is more efficient and equitable — go deep on one mechanism rather than listing several points.

Body 2 — Acknowledge the genuine exception: rural and remote areas where public transport is not viable and roads are the only realistic link to essential services.

Conclusion — Restate the conditional position without contradiction or new information.

Model essay

Band 8.5–9.0 model essay

332 words

Some believe that government expenditure should be directed primarily towards roads and motorways rather than public transport networks such as railways and trams. In my view, while road investment remains necessary in less developed or rural regions, public transport should generally receive greater priority given its broader long-term societal and environmental benefits.

To begin, investment in public transport systems yields more substantial long-term benefits than expanding road infrastructure. To clarify, railways and trams can transport considerably larger numbers of passengers per vehicle than private cars, thereby alleviating traffic congestion far more effectively than additional road lanes, which tend to attract further car use over time rather than resolving the underlying problem. Moreover, public transport produces substantially lower carbon emissions per passenger than private vehicles, making it a far more environmentally sustainable option amid growing concerns over air pollution and climate change. Public transport also promotes social equity, as it provides affordable mobility to individuals who cannot afford a private vehicle, unlike motorway expansion, which disproportionately benefits car owners.

However, in less densely populated or rural regions, continued investment in roads remains justified. This is because establishing railway or tram infrastructure in sparsely populated areas is often financially unviable, given the limited passenger numbers that would use such services. In these contexts, residents typically rely on private vehicles for essential travel, such as commuting to distant workplaces or accessing healthcare facilities, making well-maintained roads indispensable to their daily lives. Neglecting road maintenance in such regions would therefore disproportionately harm communities that have no viable public transport alternative available to them. Moreover, agricultural and industrial goods produced in rural areas typically depend on road freight for distribution to urban markets, meaning that underinvestment in rural roads could also undermine regional economic activity.

To conclude, although road investment remains essential in rural areas with limited population density, I believe that, on balance, public transport should receive greater government funding given its substantial advantages in reducing congestion, protecting the environment and ensuring equitable access to mobility.

Created by a Band 8.5–9.0 IELTS Writing achiever — Premium. Sign up free to read the rest of this essay and unlock every model on the site.

Get free access →

Ideas & vocabulary for this topic

Ideas you can use

  • Introduction: Mostly disagree with prioritising roads over public transport, arguing that public transport should generally get more funding, while conceding roads matter in rural areas.
  • Body 1: Argue that trains and trams cut congestion and emissions more effectively than extra road lanes, and provide more equitable mobility for people without cars.
  • Body 2: Concede that in sparsely populated or rural regions, rail is not financially viable, so continued road investment remains essential for residents' daily travel and freight.
  • Conclusion: Reaffirm the balance: rural roads still deserve funding, but on the whole public transport should be the higher spending priority for congestion, environmental and equity reasons.
Word or phraseMeaningUsed in a sentence
alleviatingmaking a problem less severethereby alleviating traffic congestion far more effectively
sustainableable to continue long-term without depleting resources or harming the environmentmaking it a far more environmentally sustainable option
social equityfairness in how resources or opportunities are distributed among peoplepublic transport also promotes social equity
disproportionatelyin a way that is too large or small compared with something elseunlike motorway expansion, which disproportionately benefits car owners
financially unviablenot able to be sustained profitably or affordablyestablishing railway or tram infrastructure in sparsely populated areas is often financially unviable
indispensableabsolutely necessarymaking well-maintained roads indispensable to their daily lives
road freightgoods transported by road vehiclestypically depend on road freight for distribution to urban markets
underinvestmentproviding too little money or resources to somethingunderinvestment in rural roads could also undermine regional economic activity

Created by a Band 8.5–9.0 IELTS Writing achiever — Premium. Sign up free to see the ideas and vocabulary for this topic and unlock every model on the site.

Get free access →

Write your own answer

Draft your response below and get it marked against all four IELTS criteria — free, no account, one check a day.

0 words Check my answer

Answers checked here may be published on this page, without your name, to help other learners. Nothing else about you is stored.